The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 23:06, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Created/expanded by
Jetstreamer (
talk). Self nom at 15:24, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Articles need 1500 characters of prose - this only has 262 as anything in the table does not count.
SmartSE (
talk) 01:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
Will manage to expand the prose in the article shortly.--
Jetstreamer (
talk) 14:30, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
I expanded the prose section of the article. Please let me know if it's ok now.--
Jetstreamer (
talk) 00:09, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
I made some changes to the prose, which is now over the threshold with 1638 characters. The sourcing looks OK, and spot checks didn't reveal anything too alarming. It's well laid out, comprehensively referenced and quite interesting (and definitely a bit scary). Good to go now.
Prioryman (
talk) 20:27, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the copyedit!--
Jetstreamer (
talk) 20:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)