The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
PFHLai (
talk) 09:21, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Created by
Bonkers The Clown (
talk). Self nominated at 10:16, 1 November 2013 (UTC).
Length ok, date ok, hook and cite ok, QPQ done, no copyvio found. Note that the name of this review page is not the same as the article name (cyber attacks as opposed to cyberattacks) and copyvio checks etc need to be amended accordingly. SpinningSpark 11:04, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
The linked article in the hook is "... cyberattacks" and that's all that matters. ☯
BonkersThe Clown\(^_^)/ Nonsensical Babble ☯ 07:22, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
It doesn't matter...except, as I said above, it stops the links to copyvio, dab, and EL checks from working properly. Just warning other editors that they need to manually adjust the name if they are running the checks for themselves. SpinningSpark 09:20, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
That's fine, it never was an issue that would affect DYK promotion in any case. SpinningSpark 12:24, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Final review needed. Note that Bonkers The Clown has been blocked indefinitely today (though indef blocks can be reversed), so that if there are significant issues, Bonkers is unlikely to be able to fix them.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 23:47, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Good to go as far as I am concerned. SpinningSpark 11:17, 15 November 2013 (UTC)