{{subst:ArbComOpenCase/Proposed decision|<case name>| totalarb = 14 | recusearb = 0 | inactivearb = 0 }}
Note: The totalarb, recusearb and inactivearb parameters are optional. If you omit all three, then you'll get the classic instructions for calculating a majority in the substituted page. If you provide any one of the parameters, then any others you omit above will default to the values shown.
With none of the optional parameters defined, you'll get the page below.
all proposed
After considering [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Evidence|/Evidence]] and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|/Workshop]] place proposals which are ready for voting here.
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, {M} Arbitrator(s) is/are recused and {N} is/are inactive, so {14-M-N} out of 14 arbitrators are available and { floor((14-M-N)/2)+1} votes are a majority.
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-Arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Place those on [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/{{{1}}}/Workshop|/Workshop]].
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
Clerks and arbitrators should use this section to clarify their understanding of the final decision--at a minimum, a list of items that have passed. Additionally, a list of which remedies are conditional on others (for instance a ban that should only be implemented if a mentorship should fail), and so on. Arbitrators should not pass the motion until they are satisfied with the implementation notes.
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.