![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Zisi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:26, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
The phrasing of this subsection, namely, "See also", is a little odd. As it stands, it says that the Great Learning and the Chung Yung constituted the foundation of Confucian Orthodoxy. This is a defensible standpoint, but the usual judgement is that the Four Books constituted this foundation. If that, more normal, meaning is what was intended, one must insert a `which' at the beginning of the clause. Which I will do, in due time. Or perhaps the confusion is about "constituted". It is not a synonym for 'makes up a part of'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.236.211.247 ( talk) 03:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)