This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Zaido: Pulis Pangkalawakan at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Episode | Date | Ratings | Rank |
---|---|---|---|
01 | September 24, 2007 | 34.6% [1] | 2nd |
02 | September 25, 2007 | 33.3% [2] | 2nd |
03 | Septemper 26, 2007 | 34.8% [3] | 1st |
04 | September 27, 2007 | 34.1% [4] | 3rd |
placed this table here. it apparently is a non-encyclopedic list but it does have some content which can be integrated into the main article.
203.167.2.209 05:55, 1 October 2007 (UTC) 01 0ct 07, 13:54 manunulat pangkalawakan
It seems that there are still some people out there that hate the show. I have had to delete one user's rather unfavorable comments that were put in the Plot section of the article. Said user put down such things as "gay" (in reference to Dennis Trillo's character), and "asshole" (in reference to Shaider). The last sentence went on to state how bad the show was from the user's perspective. The comments have since then been deleted, and I am requesting that the article be put under semi-protection to prevent any further vandalism in the future. Thank you.
68.231.133.207 04:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
i think this series should indicate as loosely based for the following differences: Fuuma Le-ar vs Kuuma Le-ar/ Galactic Union Police vs Galactic Force Space City (?) †Bloodpack† 15:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
i agree with the "loosely based" distinction, however certain sequences in the series have hinted at a continuity between this series and the original Shaider. Paladin.cross 13:22, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, there are some plot holes here as well. Alexis Del Mundo is an Earthling. How did Gallian became his grandson if Gallian is an alien? ```` Maverick Hunter X 7:19, 17 October 2007 (HK)
I think this page about zaido should be protected. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbr999 ( talk • contribs) 12:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
semi-protection is okay. at least those editing can be identified now. weeds out the chaff who really just wanna hate on the page. Paladin.cross 07:11, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
i guess the protection was lifted. at least the Zaido haters are being more civilized now. Paladin.cross 01:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Requesting full protection for this page. Paladin.cross 01:57, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Sir, I was wondering why my restoration of some valid point of discussion about the story line deviations was deleted. It may have been posted earlier by Zaido haters, but I would like to make clear that I am not one and I am trying to make the presentation much more encyclopedic. If you would allow it I am willing to tone done its title into "Deviations from the storyline." I hope you could entertain my question. Thank you. Supaagekireddo 22:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
It would be more neutral to title the section as Criticism. Taking off excessive boldface and italics. In encyclopedic articles, the presentation of criticism has to be presented as neutrally as possible in order to preserve NPOV. Paladin.cross 03:22, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
okay, i've rephrased the salient points of the criticism section. Paladin.cross 04:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
There are some editors of this page that insist on altering it to reflect their negative views about the production. I've repeatedly tried to present the information they present as neutrally as possible. Yet they persist.
IMO, it's is no longer encyclopedic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paladin.cross ( talk • contribs) 01:39, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
This is an ongoing television and as such they may be very few published sources available, but please indicate the sources of your information for specific items. (for example, i'm sure there must have been a published source for the age references for the Zaido.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.131.133.142 ( talk) 08:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
ok added a reliable source —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Zantets (
talk •
contribs)
04:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
GMA/Kapuso Fanboys dont just delete sections without analyzing facts first. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
121.54.68.18 (
talk)
13:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
ok removed forum references —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.68.18 ( talk) 04:08, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
We're forgetting that PEP is a blog. By this standard, the whole article would vanish. - Mike Abundo 06:20, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
the article focuses too much on the self promotion of the show and cast. if you notice this article heavily concentrated on the stars of the show itself signaling a conflict of interest. also the criticisms section is frequently removed by authors who focusing on adding casting information only. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zantets ( talk • contribs) 03:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
it seems that some gma die hard fans or gma hired promoters are keeping on removing the the negative aspect of the show(although a kapuso myself). if you cant afford to build your own zaido fan site, stop bugging down wikipedia. study hard work hard and maybe someday you can host your own extravagant zaido fan site lol. the vocal uproar from shaider fans is too much to just be ignored and just deleted if your talking about references then Its much better to just remove this entire article because its not properly referenced either. talking about references, try gooling Zaido (remember google the #1 search engine) and see the results. youll see about 20 gargantuan negative comments vs 1 good comment about zaido. its overwhelming. no wonder this article was quickly vandalized. zaido is really PHENOMENAL! lol the truth is exceedingly obvious: ZAIDO S*CKS!! Eat with it, sleep with it, live with it. thats all! Be honest ok!! God is watching, Godbless —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zantets ( talk • contribs) 15:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
All criticism sections need to be sourced to reliable sources. As it stands, all that was used are blogs and forum posts, which cannot be taken as reliable or linked to under WP:EL.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 21:17, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
I don't think there has ever been any challenge to what the content of the criticism section contains. It's just that without reliable sources, it won't pass WP:RS. Paladin.cross 03:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia has policies, and guidelines to enforce these policies. Whether it is a guideline, a rule or a policy we are required to follow them unless common sense tells us not to. WP:NOT, WP:OR and WP:V are the basic policies WP has - blogs, networking cites and web forums aren't supposed to be used as sources since they're not reliable, and are all OR.
And as Paladin said, nobody's disputing the criticism section, what we are asking is to use reliable sources as references. -- Howard the Duck 04:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
I've added a criticism to Zaido with a valid reference. I hope this would be followed by other critics of the series. Starczamora 16:53, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Way to go Starc. I hope this will serve as an example. Paladin.cross 02:32, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
I put the OR template because I have found several details in the article that are merely based on observation. Starczamora 17:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Which details? Would what you suggest in the succeeding section, indicating episode numbers a good way to over come the OR tag? Zaido started on 24 September and runs monday to friday, so... today would be Episode 36 i believe. Paladin.cross 02:36, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
Please indicate the episodes used for the cast profiles. You can refer to what I have done with Ida II or to the Wiki page of Smallville. Thanks! Starczamora 13:57, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
What happened to that section ? Shaider is an important character there. He is the one who narrated the Zaido Armor and information about the Time Space Warp. Rubiks is also a character there. Moonfang ( talk) 12:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
While I applaud JBR999's efforts to write everything about Zaido, I feel that the article needs to be cleaned up some more. I'm confused with some of the text. To jbr999, please do not just remove the tag without talking about it over here. I'll come about to repairing some of the stuff myself. Thank you. -- Eaglestorm ( talk) 14:21, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Don't think that sources are very reliable, such as the creator not being a fan of Shaider, what do it have to do with with being negative. The USA Otaku had no link and more like a reception. There not cite for Lorna Tolentino about being miscast. I don't think the there should be a criticism section at all. ( mich ( talk) 23:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC))
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:25, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 11:53, 23 August 2019 (UTC)