This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spain Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rivers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Pollution of the Zadorra page were merged into Zadorra. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

I propose that Zadorra river' pollution be merged into Zadorra. I think that the content in the Zadorra river' pollution article can easily be explained in the context of Zadorra, and the Zadorra river' pollution article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Zadorra will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Alanl ( talk) 06:24, 6 September 2011 (UTC) reply

• Oppose. It appears to be notable enough for its own article. -- Alan Liefting ( talk) - 04:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC) reply
• Oppose. Same reason, the relevance of the article is not very clear to me though. All the same, I think a small summary section in this article with a link to the Pollution article should work. Iñaki LL ( talk) 17:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC) reply