From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Link20XX (
talk ·
contribs )
00:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
Hey I will be reviewing this article, though it may take a bit cause its a long article.
Link20XX (
talk )
00:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
@
Morgan695 : I have completed my initial review. Just a few things before I can promote the article. I have made a few
bold edits already.
Checklist
Is it well written ?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
B. It complies with the
manual of style guidelines for
lead sections ,
layout ,
words to watch ,
fiction , and
list incorporation :
Is it
verifiable with no original research ?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with
the layout style guideline :
B. All
in-line citations are from
reliable sources , including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or
likely to be challenged , and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the
scientific citation guidelines :
C. It contains
no original research :
D. It contains no
copyright violations nor
plagiarism :
Is it broad in its coverage ?
A. It addresses the
main aspects of the topic:
B. It stays
focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see
summary style ):
Is it
neutral ?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable ?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing
edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by
images ?
A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status , and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content :
B. Images are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions :
Overall :
Pass or Fail:
Lead:
Link the article on "homoeroticism", as that's a word that is probably not known by the everyday person.
Terminology and etymology:
In the second paragraph, you shouldn't wikilink "rose", as that's something that most people know.
I think it's best to keep, as "rose" has several different meanings (the past tense of "rise", a color, a type of wine, etc.). It's useful to explicate that it's in reference to the flower, especially in contrast to "yuri" as "lily".
Unless I'm missing something, neither Lezhin nor Tappytoon use the term lily in the source provided.
History:
Reference 35 appears to just redirect to the main site. Is this intentional?
Repaired the archive link.
Reference 37 has a "page needed" tag
That is all. Once they have all been addressed, ping me and I will pass it.
Link20XX (
talk )
03:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
@
Link20XX : Edits have been implemented.
Morgan695 (
talk )
05:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
@
Morgan695 : The changes implemented are enough. The result of this review is Pass . Congratulations and nice work!
Link20XX (
talk )
05:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
@
Link20XX : , Great, thank you! And thank you for your diligence in taking on so many of my GANs.
Morgan695 (
talk )
05:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply
@
Morgan695 : Don't mention it, I was just helping out. Anyway, I hope you nominate a fact from this article now that you can.
Link20XX (
talk )
06:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
reply