This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / Technology / Weaponry / Asian / Chinese C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Asian military history task force Chinese military history task force

It is requested that an image or photograph of a photo, or perhaps a diagram/schematic? be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Key elements to this article are not listed in the cited article; namely range and maximum speed, bringing facts into question. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.154.38 ( talk • contribs)

What weirds me out is that even though there are few sources that directly link the mentioned people (except the 705 guy) to the torpedo, the fields-of-work of many of all these guys check out: 丁文江 really has an award for the alloy on use for a [redacted-something] torpedo, and 贺昱曜 has indeed published in journals that concern torpedos and electric motors. Either someone involved got his head heated and decided to praise the work of some Chinese dual-use scientists on Wikipedia, or there's a puff piece in Chinese that got lost with bit rot. -- Artoria 2e5 🌉 06:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC) reply

The appropriate infobox is {{ Infobox Weapon}} - MBK ₀₀₄ 02:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply