From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Numbermaniac (
talk ·
contribs)
02:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
reply
- GA1: Correct spelling and grammar throughout the article.
- GA2: A long list of good references.
- GA3: No unnecessary detail, good coverage in its aspects.
- GA4: Not so much applicable here, but still no bias throughout.
- GA5: Currently no content dispute or edit war in the article's history.
- GA6: Images correctly presented in the article, all relevant to the article's topic.
With a few more checks, this article could definitely be GA-status! Yay! :P.
Numbermaniac
- T
- C
03:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
reply
- How can I help? Images?
Synergee (
talk)
06:06, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
reply