This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
A fact from YaYa Gosselin appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that YaYa Gosselin booked her first job a month after signing with an agent at the age of five?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
@
Yoninah: I believe Gosselin meets
WP:NACTOR as she has had major roles in
FBI: Most Wanted and
We Can Be Heroes (film). I'm currently working on sources and removed claims that can not be reliably sourced. However, there's this sentence: Gooselin stated the physicality, harness and stunt work was "so much fun to learn" but said she "[couldn't] even count how many times [the film crew] told [her] not to point [her] toes when [she] kicked."citation needed which is only cited using the interview.
Pamzeis (
talk)
11:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC)reply
I think we may need a new reviewer as the current reviewer has not edited this page since 18 January and Wikipedia since 19 January.
Pamzeis (
talk)
01:30, 7 February 2021 (UTC)reply
For what it's worth, I'm not sure if Sweety High is that reliable. I checked their about page and it gives no mention of any named staff (indeed the given link doesn't have a byline), but I assume they have paid staff. For what it's worth the source is probably okay for information since it's an interview, but not necessarily to establish notability. I did find some coverage from sites like Deadline suggesting she could be notable, if marginally. As for the nomination, I'm willing to take over the review in Yoninah's stead once the remaining issues have been sorted out.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew14:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Narutolovehinata5: There's a reply on the noticeboard from Elliot321: I would say this source is marginally reliable. Looking around, I haven't seen any evidence of unreliability, fabricated information, etc. However, the source hasn't been mentioned as reliable in any other reliable sources, from what I can tell. I'd use it cautiously.Pamzeis (
talk)
07:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
That is noted. Given that it's an interview with the person, I'm willing to assume good faith that the information is accurate. As it's getting late right now where I live I'll take a second look at the article soon, hopefully by tomorrow.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew14:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)reply
The article was new enough and long enough at the time of the nomination. The nominator has only one prior DYK credit so no QPQ is necessary. The date of birth is not mentioned in the TV Guide article but rather in the Tweet reference in the infobox; as the DOB is mentioned in the prose, the reference will have to be duplicated there too. Regarding the subject's notability, I'd say she's maybe marginally notable with the Deadline coverage being what pushes her over the top. The main issue I can see right now is that neither hook fact is actually mentioned in the article at all; DYK hooks require that the facts mentioned are discussed in the article prose.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew10:47, 16 February 2021 (UTC)reply
@
Narutolovehinata5: I removed the section because there is nothing encyclopedic about someone being surprised for their non-birthday. It's a cute story but ultimately trivia and celebrity magazine fluff that does not improve the article for a reader.
Slywriter (
talk)
14:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
As I see the paragraph has been re-added with no edit notes showing why it's useful information, I'm just going to state my opposition to this being a DYK as I see no benefit for our readers
Slywriter (
talk)
15:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)reply
Checking the source, all four new hooks are verified and mentioned in the same sentence in the article. The "agent at the age of five" angle is probably the more interesting option here so let's go with ALT3/ALT4/ALT4a here with no particular preference as to what to use.
Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew00:18, 20 February 2021 (UTC)reply