This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
But the page I am linking to is the information page FOR THE OS. The xbox.com home page contains no actual reference to the system software. It would be like linking to the Ford website when you are talking about a Ford engine CaptainPedge |
Talk17:37, 17 January 2017 (UTC)reply
You know what? I'm out. You win. I just don't care anymore. But I STRONGLY suggest you step away and think about the way you have been acting here. CaptainPedge |
Talk16:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Aha! The famous "logically"! When someone says "Logically, it should be so", he or she is saying "I think it should be so an don't care what others think".
I am a little anxious to see who is the next winning bully. CaptainPedge bullied me and got his way. FleetCommand bullied CaptainPedge and got his way. Who will be the next to bully FleetCommand and get his own way? And most importantly, what will be the next fallacious URL? Of course, part of me prefers this to remain like one those movie sequels that are announce but never made.
You do have a point, after reading the comments made by CaptainPedge on here... well lets just say I'm staying way out of it. Maybe they didn't read the note saying be respectable to others? I'm not even sure that the InfoBox needs a website URL? In response to your comment about who will be the next bully, I say grab some popcorn sit back and watch the next argument unfold.
Wagnerp16 (
talk)
08:46, 26 January 2017 (UTC)reply
Is there a COPYVIO issue, or just that it's unsourced? If the former, please let me know where the information was copied from. If the latter, feel free to
WP:BOLDly remove it. --
ferret (
talk)
13:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC)reply
Just remove it, you've got consensus on your side it looks like.
WP:BRD. It was boldly added, now you revert, then we can discuss if needed. --
ferret (
talk)
17:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)reply
uh why was that table removed? I spent a good time working on that and not copying and pasting info from xbox so that it wasn't copy right. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Gh0sti100 (
talk •
contribs)
19:16, 3 May 2017 (UTC)reply
In my personal opinion, I feel that the version history list should exist. If any copyright violations do exist, remove the offending content, but leave the list intact. Personally, I used the list as a quick and easy reference of changes in current and former versions of the Xbox One system software, and I often referred to it after a new update, as it is the most consolidated list of Xbox One updates that I have found on the Internet, and I am somewhat disappointed that the list has again been removed. I am of the same opinion regarding the
Xbox 360 system software article, which also formerly had a similar list.
In continuing the conversion and replaying to @
User:FleetCommand I think the editors over at
Windows 10 Version History handled the situation really well. It, too, had the copyright and other issues that this place faced. However, it has been dealt with without the nuke everything approach, and the result is a much better article. And I looked at the Wikipedia policy about "nochangelog", and it seems to have been revised. It now simply states not to use first party as the source for detailed software updates. If something is notable enough, many third party sources will cover it, and those should be used. This covers the relevancy argument. If, after all, a small app by Joe Schmoe has a bunch of version updates that he details but few other sources cover it, it a full version history wouldn't be fit for Wikipedia. However, with Windows 10 based releases, including those for the Xbox One, changelogs are becoming the de facto standard.
There is something I want to mention before I end. We, as people, get to decide what policy Wikipedia has. The policy does not decide how and were we take Wikipedia. And the people have spoken. We have iOS version history and Android version history. Windows 10, and perhaps, soon, Windows Server. And all of a sudden, the Wikipedia policy changes its stance on change logs. Would you look at that? Make no mistake. It doesn't matter what a policy or an admin thinks or wants. If enough people speak up a consensus, it is very likely to overrule an authority. This is is seen is history over and over again. And remember, even admins themselves are eventually replaced by the next generation, who are mostly in line with where the current voice of the people stand. I don't know what will happen in regards to the xbox one software version history, but if things trend the way it appears to for other major software, I am more willing to say that the version history will very likely return to Wikipedia. But if people reverse their stance as a whole, then so be it.
ERA is the name of the XboxOne os. Not Windows 10.
It is a managed core much like Windows. But it does not run windows. It does not run windows 10. And the fact that all my code is full of #if XBOXONE to delineate the difference between windows apps and the XBoxOne app is clear enough to know they are not the same.
It is a facade, to make the xbox look like a windows box. IT IS NOT. Maybe Windows phone? Maybe Windows 10 2-in-1s?
This page really should just be taken down and thrown away. IT is over 60% made up bull shit. Not helping anyone on earth.
Title Change
Hi,
Given the fact that the next generation of consoles is around the corner, it appears that Xbox Series X will likely use the same system software as Xbox One albeit with some slight differences. Would it make more sense if the title is changed from Xbox One system software to Xbox system software, or would this conflict with OG Xbox?
Wagnerp16 (
talk)
17:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC)reply
Now there is yet another new Xbox console that will be using the same OS. Definitely not a good idea to keep the title as it is. The original Xbox OS doesn't have it's own page and it can easily be referred to as the "original Xbox system software". ShadowCyclonetalk18:03, 8 September 2020 (UTC)reply
We should have sources confirming that it is based on a W11 build, we can't presume from the build number (even though this is a logical conclusion). --
Masem (
t)
12:38, 13 October 2021 (UTC)reply