From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history ) ·
Article talk (
|
history ) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Cukie Gherkin (
talk ·
contribs )
00:55, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
reply
GA review (see
here for what the criteria are, and
here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written .
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar) :
b. (
MoS for
lead ,
layout ,
word choice ,
fiction , and
lists ) :
It is factually accurate and
verifiable .
a. (
reference section ) :
b. (citations to
reliable sources ) :
c. (
OR ) :
d. (
copyvio and
plagiarism ) :
It is broad in its coverage .
a. (
major aspects ) :
b. (
focused ) :
It follows the
neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
It is illustrated by
images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have
non-free use rationales ) :
b. (
appropriate use with
suitable captions ) :
Overall :
Pass/fail :
(Criteria marked
are unassessed)
Reception could be summarized a bit more; for instance, "...remarked on Samuel L. Jackson's character that "I've seen guys at McDonalds that bear better resemblance than the likeness the artists created for this game"" could be "...felt that Samuel L. Jackson's character in this game looked nothing like the actor." or something to that effect.
I cleaned up some redirects and added a caption.
Ultimately I think that the paraphrasing "issue" is not much of an issue, just something I'd recommend fixing. -
Cukie Gherkin (
talk )
12:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
reply