This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
World of Warships article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "World of Warships" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Can somebody please dig up the citations for the Gameplay section. Interviews seem to be the locations, but it looks like they were written in a hurry (the English in them wasn't very good).
Ahoj Ja osbne som WOWS nehrala ale hravam WOT. Myslim zeWOWS je podobna hra.Ale sami posudte.Ako moze posudzovat ten co nehral.Ja napisem svoj nazor. Takze zoberme si ponaucenie z WOT.Chcela by som si to nainstalova downlowdowat ale este nie . Napiste svoje nazory do tejto sekcie. dakujem — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.197.198.38 ( talk) 18:43, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Now that the nda has been lifted on world of warships can somone who is a beta tester possibly update the page with tech trees and warship types? If not since I am a beta tester I can do it as well. Nick Hartman ( talk) 21:27, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Obviously, the above would need work, but it would lay out some of the basics of what Wargaming seems to have intended, without giving too many details and overly confusing the reader.
Kitsunedawn (
talk)
09:39, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
Has there been any further discussion on adding the tech trees? It would be a huge task, but I could take it on if it was deemed useful. It would also require edits whenever ships get moved around/introduced. Thoughts? -
NsTaGaTr (
talk)
22:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
Gameplay could be expanded to include discussion of PvP (including random battles, clan wars, and ranked), PvE (Coop, Operations). Events may also be worth mentioning separately.
CommissarPat (
talk)
05:33, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Given that the game lists itself as "Open Beta" I can understand the inclusion of this in the article. However, they also have the micro transaction store open, and players are able to purchase in game currency and ships. There's also no pending wipes like happened in the closed beta. Given this, would it not be reasonable to note that the game is in "release" but note that the company considers this a beta? It's worth noting that World of Tanks, though it's been out several years now, still is considered in "Open beta" as well. Kitsunedawn ( talk) 10:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
I'd like to note that Nicholas is a paper design. It's a 1919 destroyer leader project based off the Clemson-class. It's similar in design to the Clemson but it is not a real ship and has no operational history. 24.166.71.36 ( talk) 01:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
World of Warships is now available in several different versions and a sections may be worth including as seen on the World of Tanks Wikipedia page, since they're very similar in philisophy. CommissarPat ( talk) 05:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on World of Warships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Currently WoWs is fending off complaints that the premium ship Texas that is being offered with a US flag camo is illegal under US Code. Specifically, Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the United States Code (4 U.S.C. § 1 et seq). The United States Flag Code establishes advisory rules for display and care of the national flag of the United States of America. Although not actively enforced, their use of the flag in this manor is illegal as it is not covered under the pass that is given by the US supreme court for freedom of speech. As they have a North American branch with offices in the US, they are subject to US law.
The link maybe should have been sited as a source.
I could add the email graphics that show them MARKETING the image of the likeness of the flag.
I could cite the laws of all 5 states they have offices in. All make using the flag for marketing illegal.
The fact that I am an offended American Veteran is me preaching and soapboxing. The fact that I left opinion out and only cited FACTS, should let my edit stand with maybe these minor changes:
Currently WoWs is fending off complaints that the premium ship Texas that is being offered with a US flag camo is illegal under US Code. Specifically, Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the United States Code (4 U.S.C. § 1 et seq). The United States Flag Code establishes advisory rules for display and care of the national flag of the United States of America. Although not actively enforced, their use of the flag in this manor is being purported to be illegal as it is not covered under the pass that is given by the US Supreme Court for Freedom of Speech. As they have a North American branch with offices in 5 US States, they are subject to both US Federal and State laws.
Removing my entire edit is in and of itself being opinionated. As long as what is being added is factual, and concerns the subject of the page, it should stand. There are awards and good ratings listed, why not negative reception? To rule out negative facts is making the article biased.
O2bpsycho ( talk) 08:36, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Pivotal Gamers awarded it a score of 8.0 out of 10 based on its overall performance across the WEB, categorizing it as a great game to play. [1]
Pivotal Gamers ( talk) 14:18, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
References
I’ve heard a lot of members in the WoWs community complaining about the constant balance changes, especially about new ships. I feel like we should add those people’s perspectives into the article, maybe even add the “Flamu incident” YouTubers would be a really good source for this topic Edskiash ( talk) 05:51, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Unfortunately I am inexperienced in creating tables with links in Wikipedia. Is there someone who can create them if I send him the tables and the corresponding intra-Wikipedia links? Adding them may be good for an overview. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SMS Krieg ( talk • contribs) 12:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)