This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
Oh, you can't guess at them? "We all know that many people with more "liberal" mindsets have begun referring to anyone not like them as Nazi": ongoing attempt to devalue the term and thus make Nazis look less like Nazis. (No, we don't all know that.)
Drmies (
talk)
02:50, 3 November 2017 (UTC)reply
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I've done a source spot check and all sources I've looked at check out. Keep up the good work and I hope to see more of them at GA nominations.
RetroCosmos (
talk)
04:17, 4 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Running note: I notice we are in the same timezone. I will add more by tomorrow afternoon. But I don't really see a whole lot wrong with the article.
RetroCosmos (
talk)
18:35, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Well-written:
the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
The game was developed using id Tech 6; the technology and animations required a complete overhaul from The New Order, which used id Tech 5.
Matthies described Sigrun as a "complicated character" due to her troubled past Despite being "completely absorbed in the Nazi ideology and culture", she resents her past.[32] Adolf Hitler was featured it the Venus level. Please fix this part
RetroCosmos (
talk)
18:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Adolf Hitler was featured it the Venus level. - I assume you mean "featured in the Venus level", although this sentence doesn't really tie in to the rest of the paragraph, it kinda feels like it was jammed in there. It might benefit from better integration
RetroCosmos (
talk)
13:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
Verifiable with no original research:
it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose);
it contains no original research; and
it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
Broad in its coverage:
it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
May benefit from topically relevant pictures, such as a comparison between the id4 and id5 engines? The development section is a bit empty. But this is not fatal to the GARetroCosmos (
talk)
18:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)reply
media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Thanks. Quite frankly I am having difficulty finding much else wrong with this article. I'll have a look over again and then perform a source spot-check, though nothing really jumps out to me on that front either.
RetroCosmos (
talk)
13:11, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.