Daily page views
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A recent edit states, without citation, that the hostile environment policy was instituted by Jack Straw. After a bit of web searching, I can't see any evidence to support this, so I'm going to remove it. -- The Anome ( talk) 10:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
I've created a sandbox here try to make this more coherently organised - other editors are welcome to edit or comment in that sandbox as they see fit. Pincrete ( talk) 09:22, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm now working on trying to structure the 'Main' sections and add recent developments. Pincrete ( talk) 13:27, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
I am currently attempting to restructure the article into chronological and thematic sequence. Therefore I am sometimes leaving citation needed tags on short pieces which I know to be sourcable, but where I need to refind the best source. Where these do not seriously violate BLP or NPOV - I hope other editors will be tolerant of temporarily missing sources. Thanks. Pincrete ( talk) 14:34, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a sketchy list of topics not covered clearly at present IMO - some of which might better be covered at "hostile environment policy", which at present is thin on details.
How/why affected children born in UK
Better summary of Parliamentary stages (compensation scheme, hotline etc)(Rudd, May and Javid), changes made by Javid, internal enquiry etc.
Hostile environment criticised by others (Warsi etc)
Review of provisions of HEP inc: NHS etc requirement to share data with Home Office as part of HEPolicy - later amended partly due to Lords during scandal. … Review of use of anti-terror laws vis-a-vis HEPolicy - mainly non-Windrush.
Video (my job to make your life hell)- HEP?
Broader issues - immigration caps - immigration policy. (partly done), Pincrete ( talk) 12:24, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
This reference may be useful
Thanks
John Cummings ( talk) 09:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
And this one
John Cummings ( talk) 09:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
How many people were deported??? Was anyone? several were stranded in the Caribbean for a period of years, but denied re-entry is not deported. I deleted 63 from the article because it's not supported anywhere in link 1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.109.76.170 ( talk) 13:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
These two terms do not even appear anywhere in the article?! There is the "Windrush Scheme" that is being dealt with by a specific administration team, the "Windrush Taskforce", yet the article features virtually nothing about either. (See full details here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/windrush-scheme )
Additionally, the Windrush scandal involves more than those with Caribbean decent. Anyone from most Commonwealth countries, or associated countries like even Ireland, are caught up in the Windrush Scheme, as under the Schemes guidelines it also applies to those who hold non-"British Citizen" passport holders (e.g. "British Subject", with full abode vignette printed within their passports
[1]) being able to avail themselves of international immigration controls (like
ESTA) that are available to full "British Citizen" passport holders. The article makes little to no mention of this issue, either (see:
Talk:British nationality law and the Republic of Ireland). --
Jimthing (
talk)
00:06, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Csn any experienced editor here help prevent the much-needed [Presumption of guilt]] article being deleted? Crawiki ( talk) 22:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Despite the media labelling this the Windrush Scandal it must be pointed out that virtually everyone who came to the UK on the Windrush in 1948 is now dead or in their 90s. This furore therefore has nothing to do with the Windrush. If Wikipedia wants to be respected for truth this should be prominently pointed out. 2A00:23C4:B607:CF00:9429:2DD7:B488:B2A7 ( talk) 10:25, 1 August 2020 (UTC)