This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
2) what was now the City of Calgary - should we put "City of Calgary" in quotes or explain its incorporation in 1894 (i didnt get it first and had to check the calgary article to confirm what happened between 1893 and 1895)
3) he came west as a young adult - can this be clarified a bit like "migrated west" or something to that effect?. Going west is, i suspect a common north american phrase, but for a non-north american english reader like me it needs clarifying a bit. (not that important, i got where he went after a moment's puzzlement).
I have sourced the first two marriages with a Canadian who's who published in 1912. (snippet view in Gbooks). But can't find a published book for referencing the third marriage--
Sodabottle (
talk)
12:38, 3 April 2010 (UTC)reply
2)His term as a trustee for Calgary Board of Education should be added.
Except a few very minor issues, this article meets all the good article criteria. I am putting this on hold till 11 April 2010, so that those minor issues can be addressed.--
Sodabottle (
talk) 07:56, 4 April 2010 (UTC)GAR Passed--
Sodabottle (
talk)
18:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the review; I've responded to a couple of points above, and will act on your other points. I'm a little curious about the after "no original research", but I assume that you'll get to that.
Steve Smith (
talk)
04:30, 3 April 2010 (UTC)reply
Oops. my bad. i have corrected that now. I am going through the text once more for the prose. will finish the review in another half a day--
Sodabottle (
talk)
12:16, 3 April 2010 (UTC)reply