RE MoS compliance; there's no requirement that the lead by directly sourced, the rule is that it's either always sourced or never sourced, unless quotes are involved. Since this contains no quotes, and my preference is always not to source the lead, I have not done so. Thank you for your other comments; I am thinking of FAC at some point.
Ironholds (
talk)
00:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply
I agree with Ironholds here. As everything is sourced more deeply in the article's body, duplicating references would not serve much of a purpose in terms of verifiability. There is nothing overly controversial that requires a double citation, or any quotes, so this method should be fine. PeterSymonds (
talk)01:02, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Thanks guys, I am sure it is not meant for a review to be more useful to the reviewer than the reviewed article but i guess ironholds vastly greater experience that was perhaps inevitable, I have added persondata to the article and cleared it as a GA
Ajbpearce (
talk)
10:53, 29 December 2009 (UTC)reply