This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Wildlife of Singapore is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
plants and
botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
It seems to me that "
Fauna of Singapore" and "
Flora of Singapore" are capable of future growth at some stage, so it would be better to leave them as separate articles. "
Wildlife of Singapore" should really be a summary of those articles, and have a {{Main}} hatnote at the top of the relevant sections referring to those articles. (An aside: should "Wildlife of Singapore" cover Singapore's flora? I would have thought that wildlife tends to refer to fauna only. But I am happy to be contradicted on the point.) What you could do is write "Wildlife of Singapore" first, then copy the relevant sections over to "Fauna of Singapore" and "Flora of Singapore" and expand those articles later on. — Cheers,
JackLee–
talk–18:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)reply
That seems fair, as far as the "Wildlife" bit goes, while wiktionary for example defines it as simply animals,
Wildlife says "Wildlife includes all non-domesticated plants, animals, and other organisms." - I didn't decide on this and was simply following on the task of filling the asia wildlife articles. Incidentally all of them, including this one, contain or will contain some redundancy which I was personally against at first as well. I'll try expanding the article when I have time, looking forward to other opinions anyone may have.
KimiNewt (
talk)
18:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)reply
Some sources
Some sources I've found.. I'll try to write something with them soon, if anyone has something to add you know what to do:
I have just modified 8 external links on
Wildlife of Singapore. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.