The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ireland's Wicklow Way(pictured) was originally proposed by
J. B. Malone in a series of articles in the Evening Herald newspaper?
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Hiking trails, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Hiking trailsWikipedia:WikiProject Hiking trailsTemplate:WikiProject Hiking trailsHiking trails articles
This article is within the scope of
WikiProject Backpacking, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BackpackingWikipedia:WikiProject BackpackingTemplate:WikiProject BackpackingBackpacking articles
the picture at wicklow gap is not a picture of the wicklow way: the wicklow way doesn't go there, and the sign is different from the official wicklow way signs. this must be a place (and sign) on the st. kevin's way, crossing the wicklow mountains from glendalough to hollywood
You are quite right. This is one of the St Kevin's Way signs at the Wicklow Gap. Have replaced with image of the J. B. Malone memorial at Lough Tay. -
Joe King (
talk)
00:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Unsure about the free-use of the images. Second opinion appreciated!
What is the issue with the images? They're all from Wikimedia Commons and licensed under Creative Commons Share Alike 3.0 -
Joe King (
talk)
07:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)reply
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Second opinion appreciated.
Second opinion, it looks like a great article to me. I can understand why you're unsure about the images, as you do not have experience in the area, but I can assure you that as Joe King mentions, they're all from Wikimedia Commons, and have been released under the right licenses to allow them to be used freely on the encyclopedia. The sourcing looks very good and the only criticism I'd have is that the lead looks slightly excessive. It's only a minor criticism though.
WormTT· (
talk)
13:20, 6 August 2011 (UTC)reply