This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
I deleted the the POV- and advert-tag. The article is well referenced and I can see no Point of View or ad-like style here. Please elaborate your view here before you tag again.-- Peter Eisenburger ( talk) 13:57, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
The articles are about two different companies, not about two phases of the same company. So a merge makes no sense.-- Peter Eisenburger ( talk) 05:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Since Web.com sold the NetObjects product line, I am no longer interested in following the company on a regularily basis. Someone else, please? My last edit.-- Peter Eisenburger ( talk) 10:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Company is trying to rewrite their history and create adverts Examples:
-Presenting founding of company as 1997 by David Brown when their own SEC filings show that the company was founded in 1999 by someone else. -Presenting Merger of Web.com as an acquisition when company’s SEC filing show that the deal was a “Merger of Equals.”
See:
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
On behalf of Web.com via Burson-Marsteller, I am submitting an expanded and updated draft Wikipedia article for review by uninvolved editors. The current article is in critical need of improvement, as evidenced by the 5 banners and multiple "citation needed" tags displayed throughout. I've worked to address these tags by researching the company's history and drafting an accurate, neutral, and verifiable Wikipedia article, using appropriate sourcing. While the company's history is somewhat convoluted, given the mergers and name changes, I don't think the content is particularly controversial. Over the past few months, I've worked with Web.com to ensure this article's accuracy, and I seek uninvolved editors to review the proposed draft for completeness, neutrality, and reliability. I'm happy to address any concerns. I'd like to outline some concerns with the existing article and explain some of my proposed improvements:
Again, I've saved my draft here, and I seek neutral editors to review and copy over the proposed content appropriately. The draft is not terribly long, so I'm hoping an editor will review and copy over the draft in its entirety. However, I am more than happy to split this edit request into multiple if reviewers prefer to only review one section at a time. Just let me know, and I'm happy to answer questions here or on my talk page. Thanks! Inkian Jason ( talk) 17:06, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
I got your message and I am motivated to help you. It is a pleasure to help out. I promise we can achieve your goals. AmericanAir88 ( talk) 20:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)