Waste Siege is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology
good article nominee. Nominated by ezlev (
user/
tlk/
ctrbs) at 23:56, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Anyone who has not contributed significantly to (or nominated) this article may review it according to the
good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a
good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the
good article instructions.)
Short description: 2019 book by Sophia Stamatopoulou-Robbins
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic
Palestine region, the
Palestinian people and the
State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting
the project page, where you can add your name to the
list of members where you can contribute to the
discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
Expand : Lots available on YouTube, search "Stamatopoulou-Robbins"
A fact from Waste Siege appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 April 2024 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
This is new enough, long enough, and impressive, extensive work, written in a careful, encyclopaedic style. I will review in more detail when I finish reading. Neutrality of a potentially controversial topic is handled very well. The only text matches caught by Earwig are publication titles or properly attributed quotations. I think the first hook is the most interesting option and makes it abundantly clear what the article is about. The hook is suitably phrased, succinct, and appears in the article with a suitable source. QPQ done: the nomination was made before 8 March, so the double QPQ requirement does not apply. This is really admirable work: well done!
MartinPoulter (
talk)
15:06, 26 March 2024 (UTC)reply