This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Warner Bros. Animation was split to List of Warner Bros. Animation productions on 17 August 2018 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. |
Please stop re-adding animated titles that Warner Bros. distributed. Warner Bros. Animation isn't involved in distribution; they're just a division of Warner Bros. — tregoweth ( talk) 05:21, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Shouldn't we make a Template for this like others? You can view my page here to see what I mean. I asked because I don't know how to make a Template.-- Mato Rei 03:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
What is the Dreamworks stuff doing in the infobox? – Ilse @ 13:57, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
This article is not to be merged with Warner Bros. Cartoons, for reasons already explaine and discussed at that article. -- FuriousFreddy ( talk) 23:20, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Someone decided to drop a long and unreferenced "Library" section into the bottom of the article. If that person, or someone else, can reference and cite Warners' ownership of all of these assets, it can go back in. Otherwise, here it sits. Note that this is a cleaned up version I attempted to fix up, before I myself started questioning a few of the items on here.
Warner Bros. Animation also manages the animation holdings of Warner Bros. Entertainment. Aside from works produced by Warner Bros. Animation since 1980 and any animated films distributed by Warner Bros., the division also manages the rights to the following works:
Warner Home Video also has DVD rights to programs produced by Cartoon Network and Adult Swim, as well as the Peanuts TV specials and series.
Here's an updated version with more information:
Warner Bros. Animation also manages the vast animation holdings of Warner Bros. Entertainment, which include various aforementioned acquisitions.
Warner retains ownership of all the animated works they themselves produced and/or distributed, including:
In addition, Warner has also acquired several other animated works through various mergers and acquisitions
WB also has VHS/DVD rights to programs produced by Cartoon Network and Adult Swim.
WB also has DVD rights to The Charlie Brown and Snoopy Show, This is America, Charlie Brown, and the Peanuts TV specials.
Some of these programs can be seen on the Kids' WB website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.34.84 ( talk) 08:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
The word "libraries" is misspelled in the header for this section.
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 ( talk) 14:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Should films and TV shows that have simply been announced still be listed? These productions may never come off and if they do it could take a few years to make after that announcement. -- Anythingspossibleforapossible ( talk) 18:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
I'll leave any actual editing to more experienced hands, as to whether they'd prefer to leave things as is until they are officially here with dates or not. 24.35.37.226 ( talk) 14:42, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
References
Are the release dates for the films after scoob real? Jstar367 ( talk) 02:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
Why does Tom and Jerry: Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, which appears to be completely imaginary, keep getting added to the article?
Trivialist (
talk) 01:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC) Obviously this has since been proven to be an actual thing.
Trivialist (
talk)
21:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Warner Bros. Animation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:47, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
Currently, "Warner Animation Group" redirects to this page, and the page itself says that "Warner Bros. Animation" labels itself as "Warner Animation Group" for theatrically released films; there is enough evidence showing that WBA and WAG are two separate entities. For starters, "Warner Bros. Animation" is listed as part of Warner Bros. Television Group via the Warner Bros. careers website, mainly deals in television series and direct-to-home/streaming films, and is headed by Sam Register as President. During December 2017, Deadline reported that Allison Abbate and Chris Leahy were named executives at Warner Animation Group and both answer to the President and CCO of Warner Bros. Pictures (Toby Emmerich), and the President of Production and Development at Warner Bros. Pictures (Courtenay Valenti), showing that WAG is its own studio under Warner's film division and not their television division. Lastly, WAG's logo appears on the marketing material for all of their post- The Lego Movie productions (see, the posters for Storks, Smallfoot, The Lego Ninjago Movie on their respective pages). Teen Titans Go! to the Movies, an upcoming theatrical animated feature from WB, features WBA's logo on the poster because it is being produced at the television division, making the Wikipedia article's claim that all theatrical animated features from WB are labeled WAG's inaccurate. Taking this information into account and giving that WAG is becoming a major animation film studio with five released films under their belt and a number of others under development, I feel it deserves its own separate page. -- J.Severe ( talk) 22:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Is Teen Titans Go! To the Movies a Warner Animation Group film? The trailer for the film does not feature the WAG logo, and the source that lists the movie does not specifically say Warner Animation Group. 50.50.122.181 ( talk) 02:02, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
I reverted this edit, which inserted a claim that Hanna Barbera is a division of Warner Bros. Animation. As Hanna Barbera dissolved in 2001, it cannot be a division of Warner Bros. Animation. Please do not add this in unless you find a source that states otherwise. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 19:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Can you please change this part back from:
"Warner Bros. Animation is the animation division of Warner Bros."
To:
"Warner Bros. Animation is the animation division of Warner Bros., a subsidiary of WarnerMedia."
The other paragraph says "Since 1990, Warner Bros. Animation has primarily focused upon the production of television and feature animation of other properties, notably including those related to WarnerMedia's DC Comics publications since 1992", but it's not even linked. 186.115.82.208 ( talk) 20:47, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
{{
edit semi-protected}}
template.
LittlePuppers (
talk)
00:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Elizabete de Lima Silva ( talk) 15:44, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
I think you meant why WBA wasn't involved with this show.
Warner Bros. Animation was never involved with this show in the first place, because it was done by other companies in the U.S., Canada and France. But WBE still owns the trademark and copyrights for the original series, so Shen Gong Wus got renamed and Dojo got yellow. Also, a chunk of the crew of the original series also returned, so...
It's weird, even for me. I hope I wasn't incomprehensible with this explanation.
(Sidenote: Here's a tip: watch the credits. Pause to read the info.) Andrei Bondoc ( talk) 08:06, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please apply the changes in this diff: [1] 5.104.90.107 ( talk) 16:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Why Xiaolin Chronicles is not involved with Warner Bros. Animation?
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The first animated film that Warner Bros. released in the 1990s decade is The Nutcracker Prince in 1990, not Rover Dangerfield. It came out a year before the latter and it also under-performed due to lack of promotion and received negative reviews. Can anyone please mention that on this article? Filmlover4654 ( talk) 03:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
I have no responsibility or duty to make your change for you on your self-determined timeline.Ask someone who is active in editing this page or wait your turn. JTP ( talk • contribs) 22:26, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Warner Animation Group which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:06, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Does anybody really think this is acceptable grammar? This is why wikipedia has gone down the pan. I can't even correct it because the page is locked until 2027 for some stupid reason. 86.155.235.244 ( talk) 23:46, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
NoName1390 ( talk) 16:19, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Put this new logo : File:Warner Bros. Animation 2023 Logo.png
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
January 1989
Warner Bros. Feature Animation Start date and age 120.22.181.107 ( talk) 07:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)