This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Warith Deen Mohammed article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
Please add any new comments or questions to the BOTTOM of the page and sign & date your posts with four Tildas. Thanks! For further infomation on how to communication on talk pages, please refer to the see the following article: WP:TALK
I just attempted to addend some dissenting information regarding this 'Imam' however the well documented site I referenced has been blocked! It seems it is not allowed to question this individual's greatness. Devoted followers indeed. Supertouch ( talk) 14:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
There are two sets of external links in the article, with the second set mainly refering to Elijah Muhammad instead of Warith Muhammad. I think the links should be combined into one section and they should more closely focus on the person who is actually the subject of the article. Everyguy 18:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
the whole page sounds like a fan boy wrote it...
needs to be re written-- Bijun 00:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
The language used in this article strongly indicates a biased viewpoint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.181.69 ( talk) 00:30, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I just came across this artcle so I don't know how long it's been there, but I just deleted this sentence:
The mid-section of the article is virtually cut and paste from the site mentioned. — Malik Shabazz ( Talk | contribs) 22:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately, the version that has been reverted to has only a single source for a single quote. As per WP:BLP this fails and needs to be cleared and rewritten using sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fixthepedia ( talk • contribs) 14:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Warith Deen Mohammed's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Independent":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:26, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
My source is reliable of this disputation. http://siddeeq.com/2011/11/21/laila-muhammads-interview-on-am-360-and-muhammad-siddeeqs-response — Preceding unsigned comment added by $indbad 408 ( talk • contribs) 06:18, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
"Because of this conclusion, he was excommunicated five times, but by 1974, he was returned permanently to the church." Excuse me "Church" as in a a Christian church? Surely whoever typed this meant "Mosque" or is someone to tell me the Nation of Islam calls their Mosque a "Church", I am aware members of the Nation of Islam sometimes call them "Islamic Temples" but I have never heard a Muslim of any denomination or sect say "Church" when referring to a Mosque. Did the citation at the end of the that sentence say "church" if so is it that trustworthy? -- Primus1x ( talk) 21:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Warith Deen Mohammed. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 17:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
The opening of the article uses the adjective "progressive". The word is used around the world in many contexts with a variety of meanings. I cannot tell what "progressive" is meant to convey in this context. Maybe somebody can either explain it a bit in the article, or use a different descriptive. Pete unseth ( talk) 21:32, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Warith Deen Mohammed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
23.28.214.144 ( talk) removed the successor parameter from the infobox. My inclination was to revert and add it back but am unsure. On the one hand, Louis Farrakhan wasn't really a direct successor, and similarly "Leader of the Nation of Islam" wasn't a formal title as such. On the other hand, to a general wikipedia user parsing the lead, linking Farrakhan up top as the next leader makes sense and the hand-wavy nature of "leader" is likely not an issue. Thoughts? - Procyonidae ( talk) 03:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Need to elaborate of subject's relationship with Malcolm X Feoffer ( talk) 08:49, 23 July 2023 (UTC)