This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

LGBT studies: Person This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles This article is supported by the LGBT Person task force. New York City Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Cinema Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

These pictures do not fit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PyroGamer ( talk • contribs)

In what way? They are both photos of individual Warhol Superstars who are named in the list below.

Perhaps a shot of one the subjects along with Warhol himself might be ideal, but a free one of those could be hard to get hold of. -- David Edgar 19:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Personally, as long as they lead back to the very page, I deem the links in list of names utterly useless. But maybe I just do not understand the idea (see Jane Holzer).-- Psycho Chicken 10:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I think Jane Holzer is the only one for whom this applies, no?

For the others, they seem to either point to the relevant article or are red links. I'll create a page for Jane Holzer, and then the problem will be solved. -- David Edgar 17:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Photos taken during those days would be better don't you think? The current photos are like... out of place if you know what I mean. Time makes everything fade away. Plus, we need a picture of Nico here. ( Sunsetterxxx ( talk) 15:48, 27 April 2008 (UTC)) reply

Sounds great! Do you have any that you own? We can only upload photos that are owned and released by the person uploading them. Otherwise, I think everyone agrees with you - ones from the time period would be optimal. But try convincing Billy Name or Christopher Makos and other people whose entire income is based upon their ownership of those images.... I know both of those guys (and I have worked with both of them) - not going to happen. So, if you have some, let me know and I'll help you upload them. --David Shankbone 15:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC) reply

just removing the actual photographs would be great then. ( Sunsetterxxx ( talk) 22:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)) reply

You will need to get consensus to remove the photographs. Other opinions, please? --David Shankbone 18:07, 3 May 2008 (UTC) reply

I agree with him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.92.44.45 ( talk) 02:39, 22 January 2013 (UTC) reply