This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is great - I especially love the quotes. Would be great if someone could reference the quotes with proper footnotes.
If anyone has the time to expand this article, I think that would be good too.
Davymast 11:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Biography also needs inserting/expanding.
Davymast 11:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
And who the heck wrote the Critique section? It's not appropriate to insert a critique of one's own here. Rather, one should indicate how Rauschenbusch and the Social Gospel movement were critiqued by their contemporaries and by modern theologians, making certain to make relevant citations.
"But the Social Gospel advocates were not interested in expanding Christian love; they were interested in an equality of ends." That's quite a remarkable statement. One certainly well placed in a college or grad school critique, wherein such positions may be sourced and defended. But Wikipedia is meant to be considerably more objective.
-- Vhiucgtoor ( talk) 02:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Any idea what the meaning of the phrase "the herpderp" in the Influence section is supposed to signify? A quick web search did not enlighten me. It seems to me that it could be replaced by "his." Raorllud ( talk) 01:36, 24 October 2012 (UTC)