![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Megapode which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 16:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Australian Brush-turkey which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RM bot 16:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Why do we write "brushturkey" when the googlable sources I could find use "brush-turkey"? I assume Mr.Bruijn might have pushed words together when he was writing in Dutch and I would not dream of questioning his ability to write in Dutch even if it means inventing new words which for all I know it doesn't. But in English I think "brush-turkey" looks more conventional or even, if you find dashes excessively teutonic, what is wrong with "brush turkey"?
No, I know it's not very important, but it's (almost) the most interesting thought I've had since the last cup of coffee. Regards Charles01 ( talk) 16:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)