This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. |
Reporting errors
Merger Proposal
Someone else suggested merging these two articles without leaving any reasons on the talk page. I'm just making a space for it.
Elatb (
talk)
15:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)reply
No merger. It's hard to justify one way or the other until someone goes out and finds sources (same problem with notability), but the camps are very separate entities. Voyageurs is not part of Lac du Bois -- they are both French camps of Concordia, but they have very different internal cultures, little to no overlap in counselors, and little to no overlap in villagers. They are parallel programs that happen to focus on the same culture. They are not duplicated, there is no overlap between the programs, they both are relatively substantial entries, and there is no need for the context provided by one within the other article. I say no merger is called for.
Elatb (
talk)
15:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)reply