 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Another article about this locomotive series exists as MaK G 1206. As the MaK and Vossloh G1206 are exactly the same locomotive type (apart from a few cosmetic changes throughout the years, and different engine types), why a second page should exist ? I propose to merge the MaK article into this article, as more articles link to the Vossloh article than the MaK article.. -- Btrs ( talk) 15:17, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Suggesting converting to table form...
Also intending to remove individual loco information - too much info...
Any comments/suggestions? Carrolljon ( talk) 17:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
- Go for it, I created most of the article, but agree it is unwieldy and while more info is good, as you can see I ran out of steam (diesel?) so it is a bit unbalanced.
Talltim (
talk)
13:13, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
- ok I'm getting round to it in the next few days.
- One problem is that the leasing companies hire them out for short periods - one angel trains g1206 had 3 different operators in 1 year!
- As such it's practically impossible to deal with the fleet details in .. detail. (it would run to many pages)
- Nevertheless I have a plan.
- I'll leave you a message when I've finished on the article - hopefully you will find it an improvement.
- Best wishes. Carrolljon ( talk) 14:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)