This orphaned talk page, subpage, image page, or similar is not eligible for speedy deletion under CSD G8 as it has been asserted to be useful to Wikipedia. If you believe it should be deleted, please nominate it on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.

This article appears to have been created via Articles for Creation process. But it is badly lacking in sources that qualify under WP:GNG: One tweet, one blog posting (that doesn't even mention the studio's name) and some self-published catalog entries. Is PROD appropriate in this case? Brianhe ( talk) 18:08, 23 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I think it fails the GNG. That Rock, Paper, Shotgun article might go some way to establishing notability for MaK, but not Verge (who aren't even mentioned in it). bobrayner ( talk) 12:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I'd support re-userfying. Salvidrim!  ✉ 13:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC) reply

I don't think so. It just needs some more references and cleanup. An under construction tag could be placed on it in the mean time. ― Ross coolguy 01:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply

Do you have more sources? bobrayner ( talk) 11:10, 31 January 2013 (UTC) reply