There's a general overuse of quotes throughout the article, but especially in the reception section. I don't think putting quotes around "thin" in the game's "thin" storytelling sells it as an opinion versus fact any more than having already prefaced the statement with the critic in question. It makes it harder to read.
I'm not really sure what the organization of the final part of the reception section is. It lurches from general sentiments of the game (which should go up top) and grab-bag criticisms.
On that note, you should summarize the critical consensus using the Metacritic scores.
References:
References all appear to be acceptable reliable sources.
Spot-checked statements attributed to current refs 1, 2, 3, 9, 23, and 37. Didn't spot issues with verification or close paraphrasing.
I have removed the part about Von Dorf being a parody of some dude because it is trivial information anyway. I have updated the link.
OceanHok (
talk)
14:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)reply