This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article was
copy edited by
Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 4 December 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
There's a general overuse of quotes throughout the article, but especially in the reception section. I don't think putting quotes around "thin" in the game's "thin" storytelling sells it as an opinion versus fact any more than having already prefaced the statement with the critic in question. It makes it harder to read.
I'm not really sure what the organization of the final part of the reception section is. It lurches from general sentiments of the game (which should go up top) and grab-bag criticisms.
On that note, you should summarize the critical consensus using the Metacritic scores.
References:
References all appear to be acceptable reliable sources.
Spot-checked statements attributed to current refs 1, 2, 3, 9, 23, and 37. Didn't spot issues with verification or close paraphrasing.
I have removed the part about Von Dorf being a parody of some dude because it is trivial information anyway. I have updated the link.
OceanHok (
talk)
14:44, 31 January 2020 (UTC)reply