This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to
alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by
the project page and/or leave a query at
the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
I was wondering the same thing (and also who is Shelby?) both names get mentioned but seem to have nothing to do with anything. I'd change the names but I dunno, they could somehow have something to do with the song.
PigManDan (
talk)
00:41, 5 August 2008 (UTC)reply
It does, and at the same time, it organizes that information poorly. If you read the Mark Ronson section, you'll notice it says, at the end, "Winehouse had previously recorded a slower-tempo version of the song, which appeared as bonus track on the deluxe edition of Back to Black." That's the version I was familiar with, and it's the one I thought all those other artists are paying tribute to. Focusing on the Mark Ronson version is, itself, odd. And just the way that whole paragraph is hidden almost tries to hide the Back to Black version. And, as though that wasn't enough, it seems the Zuttons version wasn't even the original. Ugh.
Daniel J. Hakimi (
talk)
11:26, 13 July 2014 (UTC)reply
The Zutons wrote this song and own the rights to it, including the moral right to be identified as its authors. Asking the question about the spoof video here on the talk page is legitimate. However the people who are adding that info to the writers credit on the page itself are breeching Wikipedia's guidelines on copyright and breeching the Zuton's own rights. Effectively, they are breaking the law, and are leaving themselves open to being sued. (I note that Google have already taken down a load of search results for this reason, so it looks as though the rights' owners are actively seeking out people to launch legal challenges against at this moment). (
Liamcalling (
talk)
13:35, 8 March 2014 (UTC))reply
Intro section
Would it be worth mentioning the Mark Ronson version in the intro section? On the Zutons band page, the Mark Ronson version of this song is mentioned in the intro paragraph,s o it seems fitting that it would be mentioned in the intro here too. -
KaJunl (
talk)
22:23, 8 May 2015 (UTC)reply
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on
Valerie (The Zutons song). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.