This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 17 January 2023 by reviewer AngusWOOF ( talk · contribs). Theatre Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Uptown Theatre ( talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

Jimfbleak, I saw that you moved this back to draft. Is it because the sources are just the local papers? Technically it is on the Register of Historic Places. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark • sniff) 18:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC) reply

Even aside from the NRHP, there's the "Our Movie Houses" book that I added as a reference. There are also some more books about historic theaters that come up on a Gbooks search, but the text isn't available so I haven't added them. I think Jim's being pretty WP:BITEy about this one. Apocheir ( talk) 04:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply

@ AngusWOOF and Apocheir:, I don't doubt that it's notable, but that doesn't automatically make it acceptable for article space. Did you actually look at the version I moved? Three line intro, two headings with no content. I think that justifies what I said obviously not ready for article yet, with blank sections. I'm sorry if requiring content is considered unreasonable. I can see that the current version is quite different, and if someone wants to move it back, fine with me. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC) reply