![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
![]() | The contents of the Uproxx Media Group page were merged into Uproxx on May 7, 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
![]() | The
Wikimedia Foundation's
Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see
WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see
WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
![]() | Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. Parts of the requested edit was trimmed or deleted. Most of the request has been implemented and the page has been moved to the new title. |
Hi there! On behalf Uproxx Media Group, and as part of my work at Beutler Ink, I have written an updated draft seeking to clean up and improve the current article. The draft is saved in my user space here: User:16912 Rhiannon/Uproxx Media Group and you can see the changes compared to the current article in this diff
This draft aims to resolve issues in the current article including:
My aim was to keep the draft neutral, concise and encyclopedic, avoiding promotional content. Of course, since I have a financial COI, I'm eager to get uninvolved editors' input to make sure that the content follows all guidelines. I'm also wondering if editors would be in favor of moving the article to Uproxx Media Group, or if this is too soon following the renaming.
I'm hoping to find editors to review the proposed draft and copy it over appropriately, as well as consider moving the page. Thanks in advance! 16912 Rhiannon ( Talk · COI) 03:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Thanks, Majora! The logo looks great; I'd always rather err on the side of caution when it comes to logos and upload as fair use, so thanks for changing the tags over for me. Previously, I'd mentioned a new source for the article, an LA Times piece that was recently published; I've now read through and have a couple of suggestions for new information that can be added:
Here's a full citation for the new source, in case that's helpful: <ref name=LATimes17>{{cite news |title=Uproxx Media works with brands to make ads millennials actually want to watch |author=Ethan Varian |url=http://www.latimes.com/business/hollywood/la-fi-ct-uproxx-ads-20170711-story.html |work=[[Los Angeles Times]] |date=July 11, 2017 |accessdate=17 July 2017}}</ref>
If these suggestions look ok, would you be able to add them? The LA Times piece is also a good citation to add for the existing content, if you feel these additions aren't appropriate. Thanks again! 16912 Rhiannon ( Talk · COI) 18:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Please use WP:MERGEREQ or WP:AFD. |
Hello! On behalf of Uproxx, of which I am an employee, I'd like to request a redirect of the Uproxx Media Group page to the Uproxx page. After the acquisition of Uproxx by Warner Music Group, "Uproxx Media Group" is no longer the used name of the company - the homepage of Uproxx Media Group redirects to uproxx.com. This redirect would help users find the most accurate information and reduce redundancy of pages.
Thanks in advance!
SteveZissou2019 ( talk) 21:49, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Please use
WP:MERGEREQ or
WP:AFD
Regards, Spintendo 22:56, 9 April 2019 (UTC)