This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S.
historic sites listed on the
National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
I added a new picture showing the subject at a deferent angle than that of the infobox picture. I also commented in a Image Gallery section for new pictures. Please use that when adding. I left the previous picture in that section, for now. Its previous placement left a little to be desired, and there was no comments or caption for it. If anyone knows enough about it to caption it, please do so and then uncomment the Image gallery section.
Daniel J Simanek (
talk)
21:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)reply
Currently, there are two pics in the article. This one, which gives a very clear view, and this one, by Mr. Simanek, which is not as clear, but shows it at a different angle. This looks good to me, so I removed the photo request template, but please comment here if you think the article needs more photos. -
Freekee (
talk)
23:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)reply
Class rating
I rated this article B-class, on the basis of the B-class description, No reader should be left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. -
Freekee (
talk)
16:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)reply