As part of the
GA Sweeps, I am reviewing this article. I find that it is in striking distance of the current standards listed at
WP:WIAGA for a
WP:GA. Although it satisfies most requirements, I am quite disappointed in its citation standards. It has numerous entire paragraphs without citation. It also has a few {{fact}} tags needing replacement. Concerned editors would do well to give this article an entire overhaul. I think it might be better structured without so many short sections which causes a bloated table of contents. I will reevaluate this article at some point after seven days from now to see if any issues have been resolved.--
TonyTheTiger (
t/
c/
bio/
WP:CHICAGO/
WP:LOTM)
23:27, 13 June 2009 (UTC)reply