![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greater consistency with Wikipedia naming conventions; consistency with article on UN General Assembly Resolution -- Ian 22:31, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
On the main page the resolutions are listed from lowest number to highest number, however on the seperate pages detailing all the resolutions [1], they are listed in reverse order (100, 99, 98.. 1), surely these lists should be changed, as the page is called 1 to 100 not 100 to 1? Rob.derosa 13:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I agree - I can't imagine why they were created in descending order as it's completely counter-intuitive, and now I'm not sure how to approach fixing them. I left a note on User_talk:Kingturtle since he created them. -- Ruyn 23:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I am in need of the data shown on these pages, but sadly the list is not complete... I am looking for a few fields, which luckily are covered on Wikipedia for a few of the resolutions... they include the votes, the countries the resolution affected on, the data of the resoulution and the topic? Can someone help me gather this data for all the 1600+ resolutions?
Moizsyed
07:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC) moizsyed
On the long resolutions list pages each resolution should have a link to the actual UN text. Doyna Yar ( talk) 04:04, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
UN Dag Hammarskjold Library says: "Security Council resolutions can only be identified, apart from the document symbols assigned to them, by the subjects to which they relate since they do not carry individual titles." Therefore, complications of the resolutions at the UN website may be copyrightable.-- Jusjih 07:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I think it's a good idea to remove this section, because there are in my opinion simply too many notable resolutions, and because it will always be POV to chose certain resolutions above others (for instance: there is currently a post-Cold War bias and a Western bias: resolutions which are of interest to the West (Israel, Iraq, Iran, Korea, Darfur,...). I think that the list of resolutions and the resolution articles are the best place to discuss particular resolutions, not this page. Sijo Ripa 23:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think holding each resolution by number on a separate pages is encyclopedic. It seems natural until you've read a lot of them and seen how they're used. The main cases in point are when they're used and referred to as a pair, eg and United Nations Security Council Resolution 660 and United Nations Security Council Resolution 678, where the second gave force to the first; or to routinely extend the mandate of some intervention as with Resolution 1697(2006); or to repeatedly modify and fix the operations of a regime (see United Nations Security Council Resolution 1267). I would like to see separate encyclopedic articles like the one for 1267 covering these instances, and to have the individual resolution pages redirect to them or to the relevant subsections. Thoughts? Goatchurch 10:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
What on earth does this sentence, in strange English, mean? John Z 10:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Has UN Security Council ever taken any punitive action against UN member states for failing to comply with legal binding UNSC resolutions made under Chapter VI of UN Charter ?
Siyac 11:01, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
The writer means non-compliance with chapter 7 resolutions. Typos?
The press and politicians are all to often saying that GA resolutions are international law. Clearly they are not. Chapter 6 resolutions are recommendations and have no legal status. Only SC chapter 7 resolutions are enforceable by sanction or war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.30.13.105 ( talk) 14:23, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
The section on consequences for violation of resolutions, and wars started by them, was deleted just now. i was going to revert, but i noticed it wasnt referenced, and really should be. so i wont touch it at this time, even though it looks like an otherwise unconstructive edit (no reason given for the edit). if i return and find references for the section, i will restore it, or partly restore it. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 04:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
I've gone through half of them and none of the well known vetoed resolutions are in. I understand that this is due to the way that only passed ones are recorded. But for the sake of neutrality and historic research those not adopted should be listed as well, inbetween those that were adopted.
Found a good compilation: http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/102/40069.html Still not 100% reliable as there could in theory be a proposal that passed the 5 permanent members but wasn't supported by the others. If anyone would be interested I'd be willing to form a group to work on this but I need help. 37.123.149.65 ( talk) 05:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
There is a split discussion in progress on Talk:List of United Nations resolutions concerning Israel and Palestine, which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. GreyShark ( dibra) 19:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
I notice that most (if not all) of the UN Security Council resolutions have their own articles, many of which are a single sentence long (e.g. here and here) and/or are wholly unsourced (e.g. here). Wouldn't it be better for these to be redirects to the appropriate list? Armadillopteryx talk 11:55, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Right now the list of resolutions is split up by resolution number, in groups of 100. This randomly divides the series of resolutions without consideration of the year or UN session, or the changing SC membership. It may make more sense to split this up by year, or to section the existing pages by year, so the result is more readable. – SJ + 03:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Humanitarianism is not a career. 2607:FB91:AEA:F5AE:481:9E39:86DC:9299 ( talk) 08:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)