![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
The comment about the possible abuse of the dna database is legitimate and should be given serious consideration.
Good article. Is this weasel words? Is there anyone we can ascribe the view to? AndrewRT 12:48, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
The Link: "Williams et al. 2004" in the References section is broken. I've commented it out but i think it would be good if somone might reinsert it as working link. (i have not found the right artikel yet... ) -- Tux2000 from the german WP —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.56.225.58 ( talk) 20:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC).
Does anyone know how the police take the DNA? What happens if the arrested person refuses to cooperate? Marktunstill ( talk) 00:09, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I believe it's a swab from the inside of the mouth. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
92.236.130.123 (
talk)
09:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
DNA can be taken from, yes a swab from the mouth, but also from skin, blood, hair, anything that carries the DNA. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
24.237.88.14 (
talk)
23:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on United Kingdom National DNA Database. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:40, 20 July 2016 (UTC)