GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Nominator: ProtoDrake ( talk · contribs) 17:39, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 ( talk · contribs) 13:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
Will take this on in the coming days.
Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (
talk)
13:08, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
@ ProtoDrake ( talk · contribs) Sorry for the wait, here's the review.
1. Article is well-written.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the game.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.
-Looks good
-"The arrangement of character parties on a grid influencing their abilities and combat efficiency." Could you elaborate on the wording on this?
-Looks good
-What are the angels? They aren't mentioned anywhere else in the article.
-Looks good
-"When mentioned, the voice acting and music also met with general praise" Needs a typo fix but I'd also axe the "when mentioned."
-Looking pretty good. Just patch up the few things above and this is good to go. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 ( talk) 13:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)