This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cassandradefalco. Peer reviewers: Irhollan, Hayleebilbray, Dfpotts, Aabouche.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 11:55, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
I see the notice but i think it is okay, it is on a fine line but is okay--- Halaqah 12:10, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
I added a paragraph about their heckling of Obama at a recent event in Florida. It hit the national media, so there should probably be a note about it here. - anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.174.11.24 ( talk) 21:36, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Who condemns these groups as "racist"? And who doubts that they intend what they advocate?
Even if they are racist liars, we can't say so directly. We must cite sources who make this assertion. -- Uncle Ed 15:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Too many individual articles - yes, I know I created some myself. They could all be condensed into two:
I'm not sure there is an actual " movement" here, despite his attempt to start one. -- Uncle Ed 18:14, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
the article cited doesnt mention uhuru house at all, just the linking of lovelle to an unsolved rape. if someone wants to find a news report of their actions in oakland, bring it on, but this wasnt it. Mercurywoodrose ( talk) 19:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm removing the Mixon events again as the links are dead and it violates the NPOV policy.
Esplace (
talk)
00:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
The statements Many people and the majority are not statistically verifiable. The article should state simply what happened without the prejudice of someone's opinion about the support. It absolutely violates the NPOV. Esplace ( talk) 01:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
To be more clear: The section on Mixon is specifically problematic. Out of the 4 external links, 3 are dead. "On the other hand, many black Oaklanders, as well as those belonging to other racial groups, seemed largely opposed to such sentiments" This statement mentions racial characteristics which seem 1. out of line. Why not residents or citizens if the link provides such information. It seems to be trying to pain the UM in a negative light since "many other black people" disagree with them 2. "Many" is nonspecific enough to need little verification while still maintaining a rhetorical weight. In other words, what is "many"? Why not "some" or "few"? There is no data to back up the claim and none would really be needed since the threshold for "many" is nonexistent. The next sentence " a clear majority of those who regularly campaign against abuses of police power also rejected any attempt to attach legitimacy to Mixon's murder rampage" contains the term "a clear majority" which is not clear. It also talks about his murder rampage, a crime for which he was never convicted. Esplace ( talk) 11:11, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Uhuru Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 02:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Uhuru Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 14:26, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Is no one going to mention the mention and even spotlight the movement got in The Enforcer(1976)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.120.22.106 ( talk) 09:55, 21 April 2017 (UTC)