This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
dinosaurs and
dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Brazil and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Controversy?
Should there be any mention of the controversy surrounding Ubirajara's description in the article? I'm still relatively new, so I'm not entirely sure if this should be brought up.
If the controversy is mentioned by reliable sources, it should be mentioned under the NPOV policy. That bringing up the issue might be painful to the scientists involved, is irrelevant.--
MWAK (
talk)
11:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)reply
Will Ubirajara jubatus ever be confirmed or will it stay invalid/dubious?
Since it was returned to its original location in Brazil, I doubt that it will ever be determined or confirmed as a valid species due to the controversy.
BoiaBoiaMans (
talk)
21:46, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply
That is exactly how it will become a valid taxon, because the proper authorities will re-describe it, most likely under a new name. It was never considered dubious, that's a different issue, just invalidly named.
FunkMonk (
talk)
21:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)reply