This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all
Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please
join the project, or contribute to the
project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the
project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Merge proposal
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Oppose - there is enough contnet on both ships to support two article, and room for expansion. The ship served in wars and other actions with both navies, so there should be more material on their actions available. Usually, histories of the same ship which served in different navies are combined only if the role on the other navies was relatively minor or short. -
BillCJ (
talk)
19:22, 28 June 2009 (UTC)reply
Oppose per BillCJ, plus civil ships are a handled a bit different than military, which I can admit is something that needs to be dealt with. Keep the status quo for now until a definitive policy is set at
WT:SHIPS. -MBK00422:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Fun Fact
My Great-Grandfather was a chef on this ship. At my Great-Grandmothers house, there is a hat in the attic that says: USS LANGLEY CV-27 How cool is that?!
Talyllyn1 (
talk)
12:47, 17 August 2012 (UTC)reply