This article was nominated for
deletion on 7 March 2009 (UTC). The result of
the discussion was keep.
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or
poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see
this noticeboard.
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
awards and
prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
This article has not yet received a rating on the
importance scale.
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
UK Adult Film and Television Awards. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
I have just added archive links to one external link on
UK Adult Film and Television Awards. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
The awards actually still exist as I could now find out. They are called UKAP awards, organized by UK Adult Producers: As of 2016 they say "
It's the UKAP Awards 10th year" And
here they say that the UKAFT Awards were their first awards in 2006. Back then UKAP didn't fully admit these awards, but the organizers were members from UKAP acting against the majority from UKAP. Nowadays they clearly state "look back on UKAP Awards when we started out as UKAFTA". So, the page should be moved to "UKAP Awards". --
SamWinchester000 (
talk)
09:35, 13 September 2016 (UTC)reply
I trimmed the article leaving the material that can reliably cited to secondary sources, rather than the award itself
diff. Please let me know if there are any concerns.
K.e.coffman (
talk)
23:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Obviously, there's nothing wrong with using the awarding organization (the organization that gave the awards out in the first place) as a reliable source for who won which awards. Who better would know who won which award than the award organization itself? One's opinion on whether or not the awards in question are "significant" is meaningless. I'll be likely reverting momentarily.
Guy1890 (
talk)
00:02, 5 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Done. I'd also like to know where you think that you're getting the authority to remove what (in apparently your own opinion) is "Intricate detail" from this and many, many other Wikipedia articles as well as established & reliable citations and/or sourced material. Please stop doing this.
Guy1890 (
talk)
00:10, 5 October 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Guy1890: This award, per recent AfDs, is not considered "well known and significant". Thus, including everyone who won this non-notable award falls under
WP:INDISCRIMINATE, with the article itself becoming a
WP:DIRECTORY of said non notable performers. We don't include winners of every local Spelling Bee competitions in the encyclopedia, do we?
K.e.coffman (
talk)
01:13, 5 October 2016 (UTC)reply
Again, your personal opinion of this award ceremony is meaningless, and it isn't "non-notable", since "well known and significant" is a higher standard than whether something is notable or not. Your recent attempts to gut more than three-quarters of this article's reliably-sourced content aren't going anywhere. Please stop your attempts at disruptive editing.
Guy1890 (
talk)
05:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC)reply