From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Make some clarifications

Can we make an article separating the Final Four format per se from its implementation in men's basketball? Aeron Valderrama ( talk) Aeron Valderrama ( talk) 19:45, 11 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Requested move 12 July 2024

– As far as I can tell, final four is a generic term, except in the context of the (American) NCAA Final Four, in which case it is their trademark. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply

AFAIK, these terms in the Philippines are proper names, which may or may not be trademarked, and are treated as such by WP:RS. The rules of grammar do not limit proper nouns to trademarks, which is purely a commercial enterprise. Howard the Duck ( talk) 09:09, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply
I mentioned trademark because MOS:TM explains why it's capped in NCAA Final Four in spite of the fact that it's obviously not a proper name, but a plain description, as explained at final four. Dicklyon ( talk) 05:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Obviously, WP:RS treat it as a proper name. You don't need trademarks to transform phrases to proper names. Howard the Duck ( talk) 10:22, 13 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Some WP:RS:
I didn't cherry pick these. Google search did not find sentence case treatment for this specific term, at least on the first two pages. In Philippine sporting terminology, this RM was an underdog from the start, and the higher-seed team did not need its twice-to-beat advantage. Howard the Duck ( talk) 22:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose: per Howard the Duck argument. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂[𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 11:57, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply
Oppose: Per Howard the Duck. Seems to be a proper name and it seems like moving it would do more harm than good. Hey man im josh ( talk) 13:03, 15 July 2024 (UTC) reply