From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer:
Numbermaniac (
talk ·
contribs)
23:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
reply
I have decided to review this article. This will be expanded as I review it. --
(T)
Numbermaniac
(C)
23:16, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
reply
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I really like this one.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B.
MoS compliance for
lead,
layout,
words to watch,
fiction, and
lists:
- Is it factually accurate and
verifiable?
- A. Has an
appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources
where necessary:
- C.
No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A.
Major aspects:
- B.
Focused:
- Is it
neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No
edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain
images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are
tagged with their
copyright status, and
valid fair use rationales are provided for
non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are
relevant to the topic, and have
suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- This looks line a decent pass.
--
(T)
Numbermaniac
(C)
06:50, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
reply
- Pass! --
(T)
Numbermaniac
(C)
07:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
reply