This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to
Chicago or the
Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
This redirect has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
food and
drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review
WP:Trivia and
WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects,
select here.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Created a Comments sub-page per the box at the top of the Discussion page.
I created a Comments section per the box at the top of the Discussion page. At the time, it said "This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments <here> to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it."
I clicked on the link provided and created the Comments section. I hope I did this correctly; it's the first time I have attempted this. If I've made a mistake or did not do this correctly, feel free to edit and correct, but please let me know what I did wrong so I don't repeat the error. Thank you.
Wimfort (
talk)
18:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:U.S. Foodservice/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s)
Press [show] to view →
I'm starting this Comments section per the box at the top of the Discussion page that says "This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments <here> to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and how best to improve it."
There was an $880 Million accounting scandal in 2003 that nearly destroyed Royal Ahold, which at the time was the parent company of U.S. Foodservice. This was a highly visible event and was documented in great detail by the press. It was discovered that U.S. Foodservice employees had systematically inflated promotional allowances to meet earnings targets. This barely gets a mention under the heading "U.S. Foodservice taken private by investment funds" so I think that neutrality is in question.
I will create a new section to cover the facts of the accounting scandal. It certainly is a very significant event and should be included in the U.S. Foodservice article.
Wimfort (
talk)
18:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)reply
Last edited at 18:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC).
Substituted at 09:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
