This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following
WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles
The
contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the
Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and
extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for
making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to
make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!
Grossly Unbalanced Article
This article is extremely one-sided. It provides quotes only from those who opposed HaNegbi's convivtion, and goes to tremendous lengths to downplay his actions and the conviction. The fact that a friend of his wanted the prosecutor fired is both irrelevant and to be expected. I could easily provide quotes from other leaders who thought the prosecutor was fair and efficient.
The article also neglects to mention Hanegbi's hoodlum-like behavior against Arab Students at Hebrew University.
The artiocle also omits clearly illegal action by HaNegbi during the withdrawal from Sinai, including interfering with the army's withdrawal actvities and chaining himself to a war memorial.
I don't want to start an editing war here, so I will wait to see if I get any responses before providing some balance to this article. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Mlavie (
talk •
contribs)
11:08, 27 July 2012 (UTC)reply
It looks like at least some of what you mention was addressed. The quotes and such are no longer there. Not being all that familiar with the guy it seems pretty neutral at present as far as the trial bit is concerned as well as the rest. However the other stuff (withdrawal from Sinai, incidents while at the university) is obviously not there. If it can be
properly sourced and
verified, obviously it should be there, bearing in mind that the
Biography of Living Persons guidelines must apply as well as keeping the article
balanced and
neutral. Source it,
ref tag it, and
boldly go forth. Just understand that if your sources are poor or things are too
contentious people might revert you, and bear in mind the arbitration that is in place on these articles, for which I'm going to go ahead and add the template. The stuff you mention, as you might imagine, has a lot of controversy and emotion behind it and for that reason I tend to hesitate to edit these kinds of articles. That doesn't mean other people shouldn't, within the guidelines mentioned.
Rifter0x0000 (
talk)
03:22, 2 April 2013 (UTC)reply