- Philippines
- Taiwan
- China
Cyclonebiskit (
talk)
23:03, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on
Typhoon Matmo (2014). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Cheers.—
cyberbot II
Talk to my owner:Online
07:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Link checked. —
Gorthian (
talk)
00:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 24 external links on
Typhoon Matmo (2014). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit
this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with
this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with
this tool.
Cheers.—
cyberbot II
Talk to my owner:Online
17:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Spot-check of links showed okay. —
Gorthian (
talk)
00:10, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus for moves (
non-admin closure) —
Andy W. (
talk)
08:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
– Each was the only storm with the name to become a typhoon.
219.79.127.251 (
talk)
07:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Weak Support Although it is general wikipedia policy to make the primary article to be the definitive most popular object by that name, I would believe that each should be dealt with on case-by-case basis: A stronger storm isn't necessarily notable, and the deadliest pacific typhoon so far this year (Lionrock) isn't even one of the 5 strongest this year.
exoplanetaryscience (
talk)
05:35, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Question – Is it the custom to "retire" the names of tropical storms once they've become typhoons? —
Gorthian (
talk)
23:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose We only do these if the storms (or typhoons) are notable (eg:
Typhoon Haiyan). If a name was not notable, though its name was somehow retired, then do the same (eg:
Typhoon Vicente). Though for the list you have given, @
219.79.127.251:, no need because those storms were not notable and none of the names have been retired. So therefore, I oppose.
Typhoon2013
(talk)
01:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- Oppose. If what
Typhoon2013 says is right, then these names can be re-used. Therefore, for the sake of future editors, let's leave them with the year parentheticals in the titles, and they won't have to be moved again the next time a storm has the same name. —
Gorthian (
talk)
03:00, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.