![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
I think Tuskegee (3 e's) is a much more common spelling than Tuskeegee (4 e's). Even if the name of the institute was once spelled that way (I guess it was) the modern-day university is spelled Tuskegee (3 e's). It's a small point, either way, but wouldn't it be clearer to use the modern spelling consistently? Ortolan88
When was the photograph taken? People (especially rural southern Negroes) used kerosene lamps until the middle of the twentieth century. Something is amiss. The photograph appears to be one taken in the twentieth-century. Why is the photograph left undated and unidentified? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.253.41.71 ( talk) Feb '06 (UTC)
I suggest that the list of all of the presidents of TU be added to the page: Drs. Robert Russa Moton (1915-1935), Frederick Douglass Patterson (1935-1953), Luther Hilton Foster (1953-1981) and during the current administration of Dr. Benjamin Franklin Payton , who assumed responsibility as fifth president of the University on August 1, 1981.
Shouldn't the syphilis experiment be mentioned in this article, since the university's hospital carried it out?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Pcman101 ( talk • contribs) 22:25, 4 August 2007
I linked the phrase "Syphilis Study" to the proper article. It's a start! Lusanaherandraton ( talk) 04:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
The general tone of the syphilis experiment paragraph seems unfitting: "Clearly, this was a direct violation of the Hippocratic Oath and not a single researcher, nor Tuskegee University was legally punished." With "clearly" and phrases like "not a single researcher" it doesn't read like an unbiased description. Same goes for the section as a whole. 2A02:8108:1C0:E5F9:D75:328:877B:6DF5 ( talk) 12:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Clean up and added wiki links MuJami ( talk) 21:00, 15 May 2010 (UTC)Mujami
Some of this material seems more appropriate for the article on Washington himself than on the school - it does not tell enough about Washington's leadership at the school: number of students each decades, growth in programs offered, capital programs, etc. at the time of his death, although it does mention the endowment. His private funding of litigation to challenge laws is interesting, but I'm not sure it belongs here. There could also be more context on the social/economic situation of the South against what critics had to say about Washington - was he accommodating or realistic? Parkwells ( talk) 00:36, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
As well, the info on Washington and the school’s early days is written in a breathless, hero-worshipping style that is inappropriate to an encyclopedia. It also makes unsupportable assertions about Washington's intentions and state of mind. This kind of writing does not reflect well on a subject, and Tuskegee deserves better. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 21:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Expanding on comments on the "Washington's leadership" section (above): The History section of this article is padded with sonorous but insubstantial phrases, assertions about the superlative virtues of Tuskegee Institute founders, unverifiable speculations about the intentions and feelings of said founders, and other defects. The effect (to this reader) is actually to trivialize the history of a very significant institution. I'm going to start revising, but the job could use several interested editors. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 21:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
In researching source material for the school's history, I found another concern: Some of the language in this article is identical to language in a document available from the Tuskegee University Archives website (or at http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/186). While the document is publicly available, there is nothing to indicate that it is OK to quote it without attribution! This adds some urgency to rewriting the history sections of this article. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 21:53, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Article implies that the Institute expanded to graduate-level education after World War 2, when in fact the first graduate programs began in 1943. I know for certain that mathematics was one of the departments which began graduate instruction in 1943, though I do not know which others. Keshik ( talk) 18:28, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Tuskegee University. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers. — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 00:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi all! I stumbled upon Carolyn Brooks as an WP:Orphaned article in microbiology. The page notes that she is a graduate of Tuskegee University. Is she sufficiently notable to include on the list of notable alumni here? I did see another microbiology professor on the list, but I figured I'd mention it here for more experienced eyes. Let me know what you think! Thanks! Happy editing. Ajpolino ( talk) 03:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Tuskegee University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 16:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Section 1.1 has been vandalized. 64.222.105.58 ( talk) 22:27, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a common fault on Wikipedia: those who write articles assume too much. How do you pronounce the name of this university? Could someone please add this?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pawebster ( talk • contribs) May of '19 (UTC)
To notable alumni Wikipietime ( talk) 16:49, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
The tone and language of the section is contrary to Wikipedia standard. If no one wants to get their hands dirty I am willing to edit the section. Spheromakquanta ( talk) 23:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)