This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This game is not the subject of any readily accessible reviews or more than passing mentions. Minding
due weight, it should be included in a list among the other more popular but underreported TI-99/4A games. czar21:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Even if there were fewer reviews, where are the few? We cover topics in proportion to their source material (
due weight). If we have only a few sentences on a subject, and it can fit within another article or list, that's the best way to cover it. czar23:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Where are the reviews? Most of these sources are either primary or incomplete citations—can't even follow the Nat'l Geographic ref in print because we don't have the page. czar13:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
I don't see why Tunnels of Doom was moved to this page and not the other way around, when there's only 1 game on the page and that's Tunnels of Doom? It's not really a "list" if it's just one game.
Gezegond (
talk)
11:20, 28 August 2019 (UTC)reply
I added a paragraph plugging the music I wrote for the program. I have no idea if Wikipedia condones such self-promotion; if not feel free to delete my revision.
HMishkoff19:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)reply
File:Tunnelsofdoom2.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article,
File:Tunnelsofdoom2.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 June 2012
What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review
deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.